<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bob Caswell - Latest Comments in Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/</link><description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:40:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187230</link><description>Total  Access  was an  economically artifical  service.  I don't know what they were thinking.    BB   tried  movie pass a  few years ago for  $25 to $30 a month  with  2 or 3 disc  unlimited  from the stores,  but  hardly 2 million  signed up and they  discontinued.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Boris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:40:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187231</link><description>That's funny, Fred, considering many who follow this might think Blockbuster's traditional model was doomed for failure. But for all their pseudo-progressiveness, maybe they should have just stuck with the status-quo...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hindsight is always 20-20, but it seems hard to believe that they'd be worse off than they are now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:15:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187229</link><description>I honestly feel that had blockbuster put late fees back in place and had all new release rentals as 1 night rentals- they'd be back in the cash, keeping it at $17.99 for 3-out unlimited exchanges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would've been the best business move ever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187228</link><description>Yeah, Earnest, unfortunately Blockbuster seems to be scrambling a bit, not knowing what to do next.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 14:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187232</link><description>Blockbuster customers overwhelmingly prefer new releases to older catalog movies. I work in LA, movie capitol of America, right? I remember when we removed the foreign section from our store on Larchmont. The customers, save for a couple, didn't even notice! So, of course, the Blockbuster Total Access catalog is skewed toward new releases, but the actual sizes of the comparative catalogs is pretty close. Especially considering that Blockbuster will ship videos directly out of its stores-- it doesn't do that as much as its warehouse capacity has increased, but for a while many of the stores were shipping out catalog titles at a surprising pace!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The beauty of the Total Access program was that it offered a convenient blend of catalog movies available anytime and new releases since you could exchange your rentals for New Releases in the store. Within the past few months, customers even had the option of having movies rented in the store automatically removed from their queues. The real problem with that is that our No Late Fees policy absolutely decimated the in-store supply of New Releases! No one brings them back!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It really saddens me that Blockbuster is deemphasizing Total Access. It was one of the few areas where I could, for a while anyway, say "See? This is something Blockbuster got right!"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Earnest</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:30:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&amp;#8217;t Work</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1187227</link><description>Netflix does seem to have a lot more die-hard fans than Blockbuster. Either way this competition keeps the prices low for everyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Netflix has also taken a lot more proactive role in nurturing young movie producers with their program - I think it's called Red Envelope or something similar - where they encourage and finance independent films. Blockbuster is a bit more about the money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Movies Mailed</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:27:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>