http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and bloggerenSun, 25 Nov 2007 09:43:07 -0000http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/#comment-1187174This enabled me to create a proxy that allows reading all WSJ articles for free :<br><br><a href="http://mediastech.com/index.php/2007/11/read-wsjcom-for-free/" rel="nofollow">http://mediastech.com/index.php/2007/11/read-ws...</a>berardSun, 25 Nov 2007 09:43:07 -0000http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/#comment-1187173Wow, this is awaome news about the collaboration!<br><br>Also, glad to see WSJ finally doing away with the online charge! Very good news, indeed.Dave NofmeisterThu, 15 Nov 2007 15:38:51 -0000http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/#comment-1187171I think the deal is as much about Digg as it is about the Journal. The traffic impact or Digg, especially if the Journal were to go free would be major. As I wrote on my blog today, access to an additional 15 million visitors would definitely change Digg's status.Yoni GreenbaumThu, 15 Nov 2007 06:40:59 -0000http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/#comment-1187172does anyone mind digging every article from everyday at the WSJ.<br>that would be great for me.larsalanThu, 15 Nov 2007 05:52:56 -0000http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/#comment-1187170The Wall Street Journal web site looks at the "referer" header to determine where the link the user is requesting came from (the previous web site). If it begins with "http://digg.com", then they show the page for free - even if it's part of the paid content.<br><br>It's a very week form of security that can be easily spoofed. It seems that the WSJ is pretty close to giving up on a subscribers only area.Mike KossWed, 14 Nov 2007 20:52:43 -0000