-
Website
http://bobcaswell.com/ -
Original page
http://bobcaswell.com/2008/03/21/sony-charges-50-extra-to-sell-you-laptop-with-no-crapware/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
Anyway, as odd as it sounds, I hope more OEMs follow Sony and allow you to purchase computers without all of the crap. It won't make a huge impact until it happens at brick-and-mortar stores though.
I would think that a OEM like Sony that really tries to differentiate their computer products would just stop including all of the crap and just increase prices by $50 though. It isn't like their machines are the cheapest on the market. This either/or approach is what I'd expect to see from Dell, not Sony.
As it is, the way they've branded this "Fresh Start" supposed "service" is just awful. And people are noticing.
Boycott Sony's laptops. This the best way to show them - from our pocketbooks. The computer companies are getting away with murder.
Another related topic:
While Sony do make decent laptops, the repair costs are horrendous. Just to repair a (defectively designed in the first place) dc input connector, Sony wanted to charge me $350!. Pulled out my trusty $1.25 soldering iron and replaced it (2 hours to remove the covers et al) - but was it worth it.
I was an ardent fan of Sony in the 80s and 90s (great TVs and audio) - but after my laptop incident, no more Sony products for me.
Try noticing how everything is built to break from them. I challenge you. You'll thank me for it with all the money you will potentially save. Just because something looks cool doesn't mean it IS cool. I like to call it a "polished turd", because you can polish a turd and make it look as pretty as you like, but a turd is still a turd.
Ever think why it would cost you $350 in repair costs?
Anyway your example is foolish, considering that is a knowing problems with Dell's as well. Hell I've had Macbook Pro with the same problem, Dell, and Gateway.
As you implied in your own article, people are not idiots. It's the software running in the background that slows down the PC, not the icons. You could happily delete all 20+ icons and it would have no impact on the programs running. They would carry on burning up your CPU and slowing your machine down regardless of not having a visible presence on your desktop.
No offense guys, but you might as well be saying one computer is faster than another because its screen is bigger.
I buy IBM/Lenovo laptops because they dont have any crapware on them.
ALso if you buy a Dell (i dont like them but...) just buy thru their "small biz" program and it wont have crapware.
Only people who are computer illiterate should be duped into supporting crapware firms.
If icons were only icons, then you'd have a point. It's not the icons themselves that are the problem. But, in fact, these icons are often linked to pre-installed programs on your computer (sometimes gigabytes worth!).
And Sony has the audacity to say they're doing you a favor by preserving "valuable" disk space if you pay them $50. Like you said, people aren't idiots. They're likely to realize Sony's message is a weak attempt at a marketing spin.
Ok Bill. So what happens when someone double-clicks one of these icons?
Maybe you're trying to say the language in the article is awkward? Fine, but it's perfectly obvious what they are trying to say here.
I didn't used to charge but everyone kept hassling me. Now that I charge, they still hassle me, but at least I get paid.
If you don't want to pay the subsidized price, you instead pay the market price +$50 -- without the crapware subsidy, Sony is allowing you this choice.
I agree that this isn't going to garner customer happiness. I Sony had simply released the laptop with no crapware, and a higher price, everyone would be happier.
Oh yes, they don't want to get sued for the things they pull off.
I wouldn't trust Sony with my data or my computers. They've proved to be dishonest and focused on Big Business, rather than the customer. If I pay for a computer, I don't want to be paying for features that interfere with my use of it, in order to further the wishes of greedy companies who are trying to squeeze more money out of me.
And I don't want to pay for the privilege of removing software that shouldn't be on there in the first place. There is no reason why that software couldn't be put onto a CD that would allow anyone interested to run the programs and take advantage of the offers.
So if the price of the $50 savings is to uninstall a few pieces of software, then I'll save the $50 and take 20 minutes to remove the software (and if anyone thinks it takes longer than that to uninstall some shareware, then you might need that $50 so you can learn the basics about removing software)
It may not be the best way to do business, but it's the way that's been working for both companies for a LONG time.
You're under the impression that the $50 the crapware companies pay to the OEM are passed on as savings to the consumer? That's a joke, as they probably lower the price $2 bucks and line their pockets with the other $48. There is no incentive to offer anything to the consumer unless their slick ad campaigns fail to produce. Only then will you see a cost savings in an effort to sell more units.
As someone who has used probably a dozen different flavors of Linux, I can tell you that yes (most) Linux distributions do in fact come with crapware; it's just that nobody is paying for it to be there. Most distros come with multiple of everything (web browsers, media players, even office suites) all in the name of "choice" even if most of the options are total crap. I think that is why Ubuntu is so popular actually, less (bad) choices.
From a business/marketing perspective, because of the money the "crapware" (proprietary for-profit software makers) pay to be installed by default, it does make sense from Sony's perspective to charge for a comp without "extra software". This is NOT sony's fault, this is the fault of the general populace purchasing product without research, preference or objection to capitalistic and proprietary software.
Look at the fact the more than 40% of current AOL subscribers still do not own a computer, and infact in most cases pay for a service they have never utilized or bothered to understand, and you will find that for the most part people are not computer savvy or even generally intelligent when computers are involved. Nerds (like myself) tend to blow up at marketing like this, but we forget at the same time that sony INVENTED the CD in 1983, for instance, which even in 2008 is technology we use on a day-to-day basis, and I cannot boycott or excommunicate them completely.
The reality is that the market is changing for the better, and sony is slowly realizing that the people opt for faster computers. This type of marketing will not appeal to the savvy, that much is obvious. Clearly the target demographic is the average idiot who knows what the layman knows of computers, and that person may be willing to pay the 50$ that sony would have otherwise gotten through a 3rd party (advertising), as opposed to making the smart choice and just installing an open source alternative as soon as the damn thing hits fresh air. We are currently experiencing sn open-source revolution, and linux, especially ubuntu (because of the sponsorship and marketing) leads the charge in some areas.
If we want to solve this issue, especially quickly, we need to show the layman that there are open-source alternatives. The real problem is that people think that they are stuck with the computer programs that come with the machine, which is what happens with microwaves and cars, for example, but not PCs or even macs. If generally after a purchase, the layman would be able to install whatever software they liked, this would not be an issue.
Huh...If it is "damn near illegal", who are you says is committing the crime? Microsoft is not forcing Sony to buy Windows, so you must be saying that Sony is the criminal for choosing to install Windows. Sony installs Windows because that is what the market demands. If they could make money selling (and supporting) Pre-installed Linux, they would. As it is not yet practical($$$) for them to pre-load Linux, they will continue to load windows.
Your statement comes off as a silly fanboy remark, and "damned near" really stupid
Geez, of course it is a savings to the consumer. Do you think that if Sony suddenly gave up the $48 per laptop, they would just eat the loss, do you think shareholders would not demand better returns. If they had to give up the kickbacks from crapware, of course they would make it up by charging the consumer. Don't be deluded into thinking otherwise.
If OEM's made the "offers" available but not installed and all in one folder, with the icons on the desktop if thy must. Then we could choose whether to install or not. That way the advertisers get their way, the OEM gets some income, the buyer gets to choose to try if he wants; everyone wins. I do think they would have to agree to have proper uninstalls that remove all that they installed including all registry entries, log files and config files.
Thank you for sharing your experiences. I used to wonder why sony laptop takes for ever to do anything. I have a dual CPU Vaio Laptop. This damn things runs slower than the IBM Thinkpad T30. Just cant believe this. I already changed battery on my Sony Vaio and my friend also went through changing his battery on his Vaio too. I am sold on the fact that sony laptops are bunch of crap never am I going to buy sony again or recommend sony.