<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bob Caswell - Latest Comments in Results of Radiohead Experiment: 38% of Downloaders Pay an Average of $6</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/</link><description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:45:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Results of Radiohead Experiment: 38% of Downloaders Pay an Average of $6</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/06/results-of-radiohead-experiment-38-of-downloaders-pay-an-average-of-6/#comment-1187065</link><description>Well, it has potential. But if you're independent and unknown, how would you get more than your mom to download your album from your equally as unknown site?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And even if a band did get some minimal traction, I'm thinking they'd still scrap this model at the first sign of a record deal. But, at the same time, I've heard record deals can be pretty bad from the standpoint of the artist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess the question is, how much traffic / downloads / pay would you need as an artist to stick with this model over the traditional? I'm assuming there's no one right answer; it varies widely.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Results of Radiohead Experiment: 38% of Downloaders Pay an Average of $6</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/06/results-of-radiohead-experiment-38-of-downloaders-pay-an-average-of-6/#comment-1187064</link><description>&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; the artist gets at least some money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Logan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>