<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bob Caswell - Latest Comments in My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/</link><description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:08:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-4035138</link><description>I absolutely love these Mac vs PC commercials. However, as funny and effective these commercials may be, I just can't justify opting for Apple products (macbook/ipod) when there are far less expensive alternatives out there that can do the same thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nancy| Cheap Nintendo DS Games</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:08:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3497157</link><description>Hi Bob.  Have you ever taken a mac for a spin?  All I'm sayin is that you would be surprised with how fun and aesthetically pleasing it can be!  Hehehe&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I'm biased!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How are things going in Washington?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jessica Shumway</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3246991</link><description>Dr.DUH-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;peskypescado's comment above nullifies your first paragraph: $300 million ad budget as compared to $8 billion in R&amp;D... How does the little number outweigh the big one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:38:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3245654</link><description>I think you all missed the point -- The Apple guy does not, in any way even hint that $350 million isn't a totally reasonable amount to spend on advertising. The bite is that it so outweighs the amount spent on development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another observation -- there's all this talk about Apple having just (barely) 10% of the market. This is usually touted within 2 sentences of claims that Apple's stuff is twice as costly as "regular" stuff.  Logical inference; Apple may have 10% of the market, but (being twice as expensive) gives them nearly 20% of the market's revenue! (18.18...%)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dr.DUH</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:48:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3184914</link><description>Didnt you say that gizmodo is pretty pro Apple before? But yeah, they've been getting a lot of crap for the extra glossy screens and making firewire exclusive to the pro model.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Chris</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:43:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3176145</link><description>Very well said! It does look even worse for Apple from within that context.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:42:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3176119</link><description>Maybe because -- for a lot of people -- "work great" is something that's already happening... without paying a premium.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3173160</link><description>The other ridiculous part is that Microsoft spent about $8 billion on R&amp;D last year and the Vista campaign is only $300 million, so the piles of cash in the ad are wrong.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peskypescado</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My $.02 on Apple&amp;#8217;s Response to Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Response</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/10/20/my-02-on-apples-response-to-microsofts-response/#comment-3172893</link><description>I dont think its about how expensive they are , its about how great they work. why do people miss that &amp;gt;?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>