<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bob Caswell - Latest Comments in Is This Twitter Making Money? I&amp;#8217;m Not So Sure.</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/</link><description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description><atom:link href="https://bobcaswell.disqus.com/is_this_twitter_making_money_i8217m_not_so_sure/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:17:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is This Twitter Making Money? I&amp;#8217;m Not So Sure.</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2009/06/07/is-this-twitter-making-money-im-not-so-sure/#comment-10615070</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rob, just checked out your post and didn't even think about one aspect which seems now like such an obvious hole in this whole idea:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Will Super Chirp subscribers have to sign some kind of non-disclosure agreement agreeing not to reproduce the content of monetized Tweets in whole or in part?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very good point!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Caswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:17:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is This Twitter Making Money? I&amp;#8217;m Not So Sure.</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2009/06/07/is-this-twitter-making-money-im-not-so-sure/#comment-10608576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Couldn't agree with you more - just posted a blog post to our Twitter blog saying pretty much the same thing. Information wants to be free - and it's about time that people realized that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These days, any way that a dollar sign can be attached to Twitter is hailed as "the answer to Twitter's monetization problem." But I'm not entirely certain that there IS a problem. Twitter is a technology - a technology which could be folded into a larger-context social network to flesh out functionality. While that might not add value directly, it'll dramatically increase user engagement, and that's what will keep it going - the value that's added tangentially.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice post! Glad to see I'm not the only one bowing down to the Cult of Arrington.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:54:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>