-
Website
http://bobcaswell.com/ -
Original page
http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/12/hd-dvd-still-winning-price-war-vs-blu-ray-player-10-movies-219/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
frivmo
7 comments · 3 points
-
Seo Singapore
2 comments · 93 points
-
SEO
3 comments · 9 points
-
Xephrey
3 comments · 1 points
-
Janette Toral
1 comment · 11 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Practically Idea Episode 2: Politics, Tech, & Movies
2 weeks ago · 6 comments
-
Practically Ideal: A New Podcast I’m a Part Of
3 weeks ago · 5 comments
-
Practically Idea Episode 2: Politics, Tech, & Movies
But I don't know. I just can't pull the trigger yet on either. Blasted format wars! The most annoying thing of all is that combo players cost more than buying two separate units. Luckily I haven't felt the need yet--few of the movies I watch are in either format (a quick look at my Netflix queue shows just 2 movies in my first 20).
Here's what I know: Both formats use pretty much the same codec, which is the number one determinant of picture quality. Blu-ray players usually come standard as 1080p whereas HD-DVD has the cheaper and "less quality" option of 1080i. But that could be argued as positive for HD-DVD, giving consumers more control (after all, there are plenty of HDTV buyers whose TVs don't support 1080p, so why pay for it if you won't use it?).
Another area where Blu-ray is arguably "better" is that its discs can hold 50gigs whereas HD-DVD discs can hold only 30gigs. But the way movies work, those maxes aren't even close to being hit.
And one area where HD DVD actually is "better" technology than Blu-ray:
All HD DVD players are required to come with network connectivity, which allows for more advanced features (which I mentioned in an earlier article) and easier updates. Blu-ray players, on the other hand, may or may not come with network connectivity. And so far, they've needed more updates, which would be a huge pain if not automatic through online connectivity.
Also, remember that HD DVDs work anywhere in the world whereas Blu-ray are region specific.
Anyway, let me know if you know something I'm missing... But I think it's hard to say one is better (even slightly) at this point. But if I were to pick which is "better" technology, you probably could guess my opinion based on the above info...
But I don't think the differences are anything that deserves a whole lot of discussion--certainly not enough to take up the several comments it already has with the addition of this one.
Um, that is, if we're talking computers. But last time I checked, capacity was never an issue for the regular old DVD. And if you look at the allocation of space for next gen movies, it's really not going to be a problem with either format... again.
And my argument was based on market share? Maybe, sort of, but I listed a couple different features which have nothing to do with market share.
But you're probably right about this topic not necessarily deserving such detailed conversation. I just can't help myself when it comes up!
...
...
Well Bluray obviously, because it is outselling HD-DVD by about 3 to 1.
.
Actually the HD player prices are distorted now because of subsidies by Toshiba and Sony in order to push their own format and try to get it established as a standard. Toshiba subsidises it's HD-DVD players and Sony subsidises the PS3. Other manufacturers are pricing high and selling to AV enthusiasts only. The manufacturing costs are similar for both HD-DVD and Bluray are about the same, and the $99 HD-DVD players reported were prices to clear the shelves of unsold old HD-DVD players to make way for newer models.