<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bob Caswell - Latest Comments in European Laws Make iPhone Officially Unlocked in Germany, France</title><link>http://bobcaswell.disqus.com/</link><description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:51:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: European Laws Make iPhone Officially Unlocked in Germany, France</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/21/european-laws-make-iphone-officially-unlocked-in-germany-france/#comment-1187190</link><description>mcradge,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I don't doubt your concern, perhaps you could explain the relevance in this particular case between a court ruling and an injunction. Meaning, I'm not sure the story changes much based on the difference. But I wouldn't know, as I'm no lawyer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, my source is from a New York Times article (one of the links above) in which it says:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"A German court ruled that T-Mobile must offer the iPhone to everyone..."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Do you have a source you could provide that explains that there was no court ruling?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobcaswell</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: European Laws Make iPhone Officially Unlocked in Germany, France</title><link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/21/european-laws-make-iphone-officially-unlocked-in-germany-france/#comment-1187189</link><description>That is very wrong. There was no court rouling. It was an injunction. There is a huge difference: &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injunction" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Injunction&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mcradge</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>